Are you ready for Procure to Pay Automation?

Software vendors provide new procure to pay (PtP) functionalities which promise to decrease significantly your vendor invoice processing cost, increase the PtP process visibility, and activate financial income from your working capital. These functionalities include:

- automated invoice matching processing (aka touch-less processing): OCR your invoice images or receive electronic invoice and match against supporting documentation without AP clerk or business activity,

- vendor portals: vendor submits electronic invoices, monitors your payments and updates his vendor master data;

- dynamic discounts: use your balance sheet to propose early payment discounts to your vendors;

- robotics: support your call centre with decision making tools to guide through payment queries, provide automated voice answering, or automate the non-matching invoice resolution workflow; and

- automate payments: increase the usage of electronic payments.

 

These tools can improve, sometimes dramatically, the productivity of your invoice processing teams, reduce the number of vendor queries, increase the visibility of the invoice processing, and improve your control effectiveness. In addition it will allow you to use your balance sheet to generate financial income. Finally, these tools will help focus your teams on value-added activities.

 

Realizing these benefits will depend on many factors, including the quality of your project teams. But also, there may be structural hurdles you may have to take into consideration:

 

Hurdle 1: The quality of your current end-to-end PtP processes.

You can easily assess your end-to-end process quality by e.g. looking at the percentage of invoices matched without AP clerk intervention, the visibility of the process, or the occurrence of vendors with major payment complaints. The root cause of these inefficiencies may occur in the upstream processes, in the vendor master data maintenance process, in the system configuration, in miscommunication between the vendor and your company or miscommunication between finance and upstream PTP process stakeholder. These root causes will most probably not get resolved by automating a section of your PTP process and have the potential to negatively impact and even disrupt your automation projects.

 

Hurdle 2: Your capacity to improve your processes robustly

To resolve the process quality issues, you can include a process clean-up as automation-inverse-trianglepart of your automation project scope. This will enable a successful go-live of your project and attain your objectives for a while. The challenge is to understand that it is the process that you need to continuously manage. As soon as you close your automation project, you will face changing demands from vendors and process stakeholders. In addition your company will engage in projects affecting your automated processes. You need to manage the PtP process, the PtP process stakeholders and the vendor master data maintenance process to ensure that you can keep up and improve the process efficiency and effectiveness.

 

Hurdle 3: Do you have the right resources post automation projects?

In an organization that support low automation or less efficient PtP processes, resources are mostly dedicated at analyzing non-automated transactions invoice by invoice, initiate the correct business review process and perform pre-posting manual controls. The objective of the automation project is to cut these activities. An outcome of the automation project is that you will need to manage the PtP process. The project will thus result in a reduction of your resources, and change the skills requirements of your staff. Confederation of your stakeholders, process analysis, communication, project management, change management are amongst others the skills that your staff will need to possess.

 

Hurdle 4: Do you have realistic goals and a realistic timeline?

Automation projects encompass changes within your finance organization, changes in the skills your staff needs to possess, and process changes at your stakeholders and your vendors. These changes need attention, time and resources and may prove to be much more complex than the system configuration or the vendor on-boarding process. You need to understand these changes and include the necessary scope, time and resources in your projects to be successful.

 

To successfully implement PtP automation projects, you do not only need to plan for the system enablement. You need also to incorporate changes in organization and implement new practices to manage your end-to-end processes. In addition, skills requirements in your organization will change, and you will have to set up new collaboration models with your stakeholders and vendors.

Stakeholders can help prioritize finance projects resources

You have limited resources to improve your finance department performance. In addition, your company has to prioritize strategic transformations, maximize the operational efficiency as well as to respond to changing competitors, customers, vendors, operational and organization opportunities. Prioritization of finance project resources is essential to the success of your finance projects and your support to business projects.


As part of the finance projects prioritization, you will assess the benefit, cost and risks of each finance project. Another factor to consider is how the projects fit the vision of the future finance department’s services and finance processes performance. This vision is build on a finance department’s performance analysis and a finance stakeholder feedback analysis. The vision, the performance analysis and the stakeholders’ opportunities are the building blocks for a roadmap of different projects to be implemented in the short or medium term.


An early engagement of stakeholders is decisive to the success of your roadmap. This stakeholder engagement can include:roadmap-essentials-stakeholder-role-resource-priorotization-transparent-no-frame-color

  • the identification of improvements in upstream or downstream finance processes (e.g. number of invoice matching to be remediated by the business),
  • strategic, tactical or operational business opportunities impacting finance processes or services, and finance services opportunities (e.g. improving billing accuracy), and
  • provide robust input on business risks and business change effort.


You can expect following benefits using a roadmap built on finance’s and stakeholders’ aspirations:

  • the visibility of finance projects and the business support within your company will improve reducing the change effort,
  • the finance projects business cases will yield higher value and reduced risks,
  • by focusing your finance project resources, you create flexibility to support non-finance projects.

Change capability of your finance organisation

It is good practice to regularly assess the performance of your finance organization and define if and how much you want to reduce costs and improve effectiveness. As part of the exercise, you want to investigate the biggest challenges faced by companies who performed similar changes. The most common feedback relates to project management execution: lack of sponsorship, poor execution, unrealistic business case, poor project management, scope changes...

 

Moreover some finance organizations are more effective at attaining change objectives. Here are some distinctive characteristics of some of these organizations:

- Process improvement is a permanent activity that includes projects.

- Finance processes are managed end to end.

- Stakeholders pro-actively support project change activities and manage project process quality deliverables.

- Quality practices are in place to ensure process effectiveness and data quality.

- Processes are actively managed to seize opportunities, resolve issues and

improve performance.finance-transformation-change-maturity-chart-transparant-standardized-with-frame-color

Higher change capability may lead to more effective use of IT systems, more robust finance performance, and reduced processing costs. There are however traits to be assumed, including cross-functional collaboration, clear process ownership, quality programs, shared medium term expectations on finance processes performance and finance department’s performance, and formalisms between finance and process stakeholders.

 

 If you want to improve the performance of your finance organization, improving your change capability is an opportunity to consider besides organization cost reduction, process improvements and improved systems projects. Your change capability improvement will increase the value of your projects as well as to reduce the risks. If your organization lacks the experience in this area, external advisors are available to help you.